Common Errors of Interpretation
The relevance of Revelation for today is lost if we ignore its historical context and read it with incorrect presuppositions. The Book of Revelation presents a sweeping picture of the church age that highlights the cosmic “war” that is being waged behind the scenes of History with individual “battles” that manifest in the daily struggles of the Assembly. Its visions show God working through the “Lamb” to implement His Kingdom, and it begins in the first century with the “Seven Assemblies of Asia.”
[Photo by Kaleidico on Unsplash] |
Certainly, the Book’s visions can be difficult to understand and include bizarre images and unexpected twists. However, there are several common mistakes we make all too often when interpreting them, including:
- The insistence on “literal” interpretation.
- The failure to recognize how the Book interprets and applies Old Testament passages.
- The assumption it is only concerned with history’s “final generation.”
- The assumption the Book is focused on national Israel.
- The assumption its visions are presented in chronological order.
SYMBOLISM
In the Book’s
first verse, it states how it discloses information - Through
visionary symbolism. Jesus “signified” his “revelation” to
“his servants,” a rendering of the Greek verb sémainō, which
is related to the noun for “sign.” It means “to signify, to show by a sign” - (Strong’s
- #G4591).
This sense
is apparent in the very first vision. John is told the “Seven Golden Lampstands”
represent “Seven Assemblies,” and the “Seven Stars” symbolize “Seven
Messengers.” This is symbolism, pure and simple. Other examples demonstrate
the same method. For example:
- (4:5) – “And before the throne seven torches of fire, which are the seven spirits of God.”
- (5:6) – “I saw a Lamb standing… with seven horns and with seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God.”
- (11:4) – “The two witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands which stand before the Lord of the earth.”
- (17:9) – “This calls for a mind with wisdom: the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman is seated.”
Jesus is
not a literal or actual “lamb with seven eyes and seven horns.” The “seven
horns and eyes” represent the “seven spirits of God.” Similarly, the
“Two Witnesses” are not two individual men. They are identified as the “Two
Lampstands.” Moreover, if the Book’s symbolism is consistent, then they represent
churches since elsewhere that is what “lampstands” symbolize - (Revelation
1:20).
OLD TESTAMENT ALLUSIONS
The Book
includes more verbal links to the Old Testament than any other New Testament book.
Careful attention must be paid to how it applies those passages, and very often,
it does so in unexpected ways.
For
example, the original summons for Israel to become a “kingdom of priests”
is reapplied to the “Seven Assemblies of Asia.” Language from Zechariah that
formerly applied to the “tribes” of Israel is universalized and the
clause becomes “All the tribes of the Earth” - (Revelation 1:6, 5:10,
20:6, Exodus 19:6, Zechariah 12:10).
The Book does not simply cite verses from the Hebrew Bible - it interprets and reapplies them. Failure to recognize this can lead to erroneous interpretations. For example, the very first verse alludes to the passage from Daniel where the prophet told Nebuchadnezzar that God had revealed to him “what things must come to pass in later days.”
The Book
of Revelation quotes this word-for-word from the Greek Septuagint
version of Daniel except it changes the last term from “later days”
to “SOON.” What for Daniel was in a remote future has become imminent
for the “Assemblies of Asia.”
The assumption that the Book focuses on history’s final generation ignores its
historical setting. In its entirety, it is addressed to seven congregations in
the Roman province of Asia. Its contents are about “things that must SOON
come to pass,” and “soon” means from the perspective of the original
recipients of the Book - (Revelation 1:1-4, 1:11, 4:1-3, 22:10).
While the
significance of its visions may not end with the “Seven Assemblies” in
Asia, those congregations are included in them and, therefore, what John saw
must be relevant to their historical situations.
Furthermore, the “Seven Assemblies”
also form a representative group. They may not exhaust the meanings of the Book’s
visions, but they certainly begin with and include them.
Is Revelation
primarily about national Israel? Consistently, the people of God are described
as the men redeemed by the “Lamb” from every “nation, tribe, people, and
tongue.”
Members of
the company of the redeemed are identified by their relationship to Jesus, and not
their ethnicity. They are the “saints,” those who have the “testimony
of Jesus,” and “the faith of Jesus.”
Are the Book’s
chapters laid out in chronological order? There are three major battle scenes in
Revelation, and each borrows language from Ezekiel’s vision of “Gog
and Magog.” Moreover, each one describes the “gathering together” of
hostile forces to “the war,” singular, against the saints - (Revelation
16:12-16, 19:17-21, 20:8-10).
Are there
three separate final attacks by “Gog and Magog” that are separated by
hundreds of years, or is the one final assault against the people of God described
from three different perspectives?
In fact,
the repeated use of the language from Ezekiel demonstrates conclusively that
the same final battle is in view in each related passage – the “war.” Moreover,
this reality confirms that the Book’s chapters and visions are NOT in
chronological order.
Revelation is about
future events but not exclusively so. Its visions are anchored in the past death
and resurrection of Jesus, but it also culminates in the New Creation. This
means it is not primarily or exclusively about History’s final years, but
instead, the entire period during which the Body of Christ exists in this
fallen age.
Finally,
the Book is as much exhortation as it is predictive prophecy. It is a summons
to all the assemblies of Jesus to faithfulness in tribulation as it bears
witness to him in a hostile world.
RELATED POSTS:
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.